Background
For the last few months, we have been focussed on the tension from external account pressures frustrating RBI’s ‘lower for longer’ theme. This can be envisaged under the framework of what is called ‘the impossible trinity’; which denotes the potential tension between exchange rate, capital flow, and monetary policy. Over the past year, one can see this tension in play in the case of India. This has led to monetary easing not achieving desired transmission in market rates.
Given this dynamic, it has made sense to us to turn more active on duration management. Thus, when the ‘lower for longer’ theme seemed to be dominating bond valuations, we had turned underweight duration. Over the course of the West Asia war, as market pricing on rate hikes turned quite aggressive, we had added back duration risk. We had preferred 14 and 40 years on the sovereign curve (since this curve has still been quite steep despite ongoing external account pressures) and front end (up to 3-4 years) on the corporate curve (since this curve is already flat reflecting elevated bank’s credit to deposit ratios).
New Developments
- Duration of the shock: Given the size of the quantity shock on various commodities from the West Asia war, the length of the disruption was always of a major concern for markets and the global economy. With the buffer from inventories depleting, the sustained impact on supply has potential now for greater damage. There is also risk from production shutdowns increasing at source if offtake via the Strait continues to be compromised. Finally, the floor rates on a host of energy prices likely moves up the longer the conflict persists. This is because of rising buildup of ships that needs clearing once the Strait opens, the capacity of ports to process this flow, and the need for nations to rebuild depleted inventories and possibly build for even higher strategic reserves than before.
- US growth is holding up, and alternate capital allocation themes are intact: One reason to go overweight duration was also the very likely impact of the war on growth, and markets pricing that in central bank response functions. This theme would have played an important counterweight to the tightening in financial conditions that we are otherwise facing here in India owing to external account pressures. While this expectation may still hold from a few months’ standpoint, the immediate data reflects a resilient US economy. Furthermore, important capital allocation themes around the world linked to the AI story are if, anything, strengthening in momentum lately.
Implications
It can be easily seen that the above two developments are adding to the external account pressures and, by implication, to the growing disconnect between RBI’s policy rate and market rates. If this dynamic were to not change, the path of least resistance would be for RBI to bring forward tightening rather than market yields reverting to anchoring around existing policy rates. That said, it is important to clarify on two points: One, the route for policy rate normalisation will still be the traditional growth-inflation framework: a prolonged pressure on commodity prices, accompanied with continued currency pressures, will obviously change the predicted path of inflation. With average CPI for the current financial year easily likely to be in the 5 – 6% band, it almost automatically follows that RBI/MPC will have to undertake some rate hikes. As a base case one should expect 50 – 75 bps hikes over the course of the rest of this fiscal year. Two, this still doesn’t imply that a ‘rate defence’ is warranted to ease currency pressures. Thus, at whatever point, if market pricing starts to lean into the direction of aggressive rate hikes (more than what is warranted by the evolving inflation-growth dynamic), we would likely consider that as an opportunity to scale up market risk. To be clear, however, this is our thinking as of date and not a commitment.
Portfolio Strategy Update
Reflecting the evolving dynamics as discussed above, we have again gone underweight duration across a host of our funds (subject to individual mandates and positionings). The primary route undertaken for this has been via reducing our 14- and 40-year government bond positions. Recent relative stability in yields has made the decision somewhat easier, even as the primary reason for the change has been continuous evaluation of the underlying ‘impossible trinity’ tensions in context of the two new developments as described above.
One looks forward to developments that may allow for external pressures to ease including 1> conclusion to the war 2> effective capital flow garnering measures. A sustainable turn to our capital flow dynamic, however, may also need some fatiguing of the AI allocation theme and / or return of some meaningful US rate cut expectations. Both are for now absent. It is also to be noted that our latest portfolio positionings reflect our current thinking. As always, these may change at any time in the future.
Disclaimer
MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO MARKET RISKS, READ ALL SCHEME RELATED DOCUMENTS CAREFULLY.
The Disclosures of opinions/in house views/strategy incorporated herein is provided solely to enhance the transparency about the investment strategy / theme of the Scheme and should not be treated as endorsement of the views / opinions or as an investment advice. This document should not be construed as a research report or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. This document has been prepared on the basis of information, which is already available in publicly accessible media or developed through analysis of Bandhan Mutual. The information/ views / opinions provided is for informative purpose only and may have ceased to be current by the time it may reach the recipient, which should be taken into account before interpreting this document. The recipient should note and understand that the information provided above may not contain all the material aspects relevant for making an investment decision and the security, if any, may or may not continue to form part of the scheme’s portfolio in future. Investors are advised to consult their own investment advisor before making any investment decision in light of their risk appetite, investment goals and horizon. The decision of the Investment Manager may not always be profitable; as such decisions are based on the prevailing market conditions and the understanding of the Investment Manager. Actual market movements may vary from the anticipated trends. This information is subject to change without any prior notice. The Company reserves the right to make modifications and alterations to this statement/document as may be required from time to time. Neither Bandhan Mutual Fund / Bandhan Mutual Fund Trustee Limited / Bandhan AMC Limited, its Directors or representatives shall be liable for any damages whether direct or indirect, incidental, punitive special or consequential including lost revenue or lost profits that may arise from or in connection with the use of the information. Past performance may or may not be sustained in future.